UpMeter.com
Google
 
polls line

Wikipedia Porn? What do you think of Wikipedia's policy allowing graphic sexual imagery?

This poll is suggested for: all
 
1.Clinical images are one thing, but Wikipedia seems to go out of its way to offend104
2.It doesn't offend my sensibilities25
3.In any information source, one should expect clinical images that are sometimes graphic18
4.I don't mind it, but I dont want my kids to use Wikipedia anymore13
5.It's the right thing to do for a site championing freedom of information and expression12
6.Wikipedia is clearly violating U.S. obscenity laws and should face prosecution10
7.It's terribly irrresponsible and all parents should be aware of this easily accessible porn8
8.JENNA JAMESON7
9.Anyone who uses Wikipedia should know it's not a responsible, credible information source6
10.black porn5
11.with porn5
12.Anyone who uses Wikipedia should know it's4
13.It's troubling because Wikipedia results are often first in online searches3
14.more pôrn3
15..mkj1
16.47309451
17.maxporn1
18.porncor.com1
19.porno1
20.redtube1
21.scat1
22.sex porn1
23.Stupid obtuse people find it offensive. It's natural, everybody has sex.1
24.www maxporn com1
25.www.maxporn.com1
                    
polls line
You can vote for or against the offered variants of answer or add your (new or old) variant of the answer:
Your variant:
Add
Find polls that are similar to: wikipedia porn
Aliases: upmeter.com, upmeter.biz, upmeter.info, upmeter.net, upmeter.org, upmeter.ru, upmeter.su, opinions.su, poll.su, polling.su, polls.su, ranking.su, voice.ru