| 1. | Clinical images are one thing, but Wikipedia seems to go out of its way to offend | 102 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 2. | It doesn't offend my sensibilities | 22 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 3. | In any information source, one should expect clinical images that are sometimes graphic | 16 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 4. | I don't mind it, but I dont want my kids to use Wikipedia anymore | 13 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 5. | It's the right thing to do for a site championing freedom of information and expression | 12 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 6. | Wikipedia is clearly violating U.S. obscenity laws and should face prosecution | 11 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 7. | It's terribly irrresponsible and all parents should be aware of this easily accessible porn | 9 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 8. | Anyone who uses Wikipedia should know it's not a responsible, credible information source | 7 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 9. | black porn | 5 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 10. | It's troubling because Wikipedia results are often first in online searches | 5 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 11. | JENNA JAMESON | 5 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 12. | with porn | 5 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 13. | Anyone who uses Wikipedia should know it's | 4 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 14. | more pôrn | 3 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 15. | .mkj | 1 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 16. | 15 | 1 | ↑ | ↓ |
| 17. | 4730945 | 1 | ↑ | ↓ |
| |
 |
| |
